Pass IAPP CIPP-E Exam Info and Free Practice Test [Q132-Q154]

Share

Pass IAPP CIPP-E Exam Info and Free Practice Test

New 2025 Latest Questions CIPP-E Dumps - Use Updated IAPP Exam


The CIPP-E certification is suitable for professionals working in various fields such as privacy, compliance, legal, and IT. It is also useful for data protection officers, data privacy consultants, and professionals who are responsible for ensuring compliance with data protection laws and regulations. Certified Information Privacy Professional/Europe (CIPP/E) certification demonstrates the candidate's commitment to data protection and their ability to handle complex data protection issues. Overall, the IAPP CIPP-E certification is a valuable credential for professionals who want to enhance their knowledge and skills in the field of privacy and data protection.


You can read the IAPP CIPP/E Exam certified salary below

The Average Salary of an IAPP CIPP/E Exam in

  • India - 9206648 INR
  • England - 94029 POUND
  • Europe - 104162 EURO
  • United State - 122,750 USD

The CIPP-E exam is designed for individuals who work in the field of data protection and privacy, including data protection officers, privacy professionals, lawyers, and consultants. CIPP-E exam covers a wide range of topics related to data protection, including EU data protection laws and regulations, data transfer mechanisms, and privacy compliance frameworks. CIPP-E exam also covers emerging trends in privacy, such as the use of artificial intelligence and the impact of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

 

NEW QUESTION # 132
Under Article 80(1) of the GDPR, individuals can elect to be represented by not-for-profit organizations in a privacy group litigation or class action. These organizations are commonly known as?

  • A. Civil society organizations.
  • B. Constitutional rights organizations.
  • C. Law firm organizations.
  • D. Human rights organizations.

Answer: A

Explanation:
Article 80(1) of the GDPR states that the data subject shall have the right to mandate a not-for-profit body, organisation or association which has been properly constituted in accordance with the law of a Member State, has statutory objectives which are in the public interest, and is active in the field of the protection of data subjects' rights and freedoms with regard to the protection of their personal data to lodge the complaint on his or her behalf, to exercise the rights referred to in Articles 77, 78 and 79 on his or her behalf, and to exercise the right to receive compensation referred to in Article 82 on his or her behalf1. These not-for-profit bodies, organisations or associations are commonly referred to as civil society organizations, as they represent the interests of citizens and groups in the public sphere2. The other options are not correct because: (A) Law firm organizations are not necessarily not-for-profit or active in the field of data protection; Human rights organizations are a subset of civil society organizations, but not all civil society organizations are focused on human rights; (D) Constitutional rights organizations are also a subset of civil society organizations, but not all civil society organizations are concerned with constitutional rights. Reference: 1: Article 80(1) of the GDPR; 2: Free CIPP/E Study Guide, page 48.


NEW QUESTION # 133
Which of the following was the first legally binding international instrument in the area of data protection?

  • A. Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
  • B. EU Directive on Privacy and Electronic Communications.
  • C. Convention 108.
  • D. General Data Protection Regulation.

Answer: C

Explanation:
Reference https://www.coe.int/en/web/data-protection/convention108/background


NEW QUESTION # 134
A company has collected personal data tor direct marketing purpose on the basis of consent. It is now considering using this data to develop new products through analytics. What is the company first required to do?

  • A. Only inform the data subjects of the new purpose.
  • B. Proceed no further, as such repurposing is unlawful
  • C. Update the privacy notice upon which consent was given
  • D. Obtain specific consent for the new processing

Answer: D

Explanation:
According to the GDPR, consent is one of the lawful bases for processing personal data1. Consent means any freely given, specific, informed and unambiguous indication of the data subject's wishes by which he or she, by a statement or by a clear affirmative action, signifies agreement to the processing of personal data relating to him or her2. Therefore, consent must be specific to each purpose of processing and cannot be bundled with other purposes3. If a company wants to use personal data for a new purpose that is not compatible with the original purpose for which consent was given, it must obtain a new consent from the data subjects for the new processing4. Simply informing the data subjects of the new purpose or updating the privacy notice is not sufficient, as it does not imply the data subject's agreement to the new processing. Proceeding with the new processing without obtaining a new consent would be unlawful and could result in fines and sanctions5. References:
* Free CIPP/E Study Guide, page 23, section 4.1.1
* GDPR, Article 4 (11)
* GDPR, Recital 32
* GDPR, Article 6 (4)
* GDPR, Article 83 (5) (a)


NEW QUESTION # 135
How does the GDPR now define "processing"?

  • A. Any use or disclosure of personal data compatible with the purpose for which the data was collected.
  • B. Any act involving the collecting and recording of personal data.
  • C. Any operation or set of operations performed by automated means on personal data or on sets of personal data.
  • D. Any operation or set of operations performed on personal data or on sets of personal data.

Answer: D

Explanation:
Reference https://gdpr-info.eu/issues/processing/


NEW QUESTION # 136
Under what circumstances would the GDPR apply to personal data that exists in physical form, such as information contained in notebooks or hard copy files?

  • A. Only where the personal data is produced as a physical output of specific automated processing activities, such as printing, labelling, or stamping.
  • B. Only where the personal data is to be subjected to specific computerized processing, such as image scanning or optical character recognition.
  • C. Only where the personal data is treated by automated means in some way, such as computerized distribution or filing.
  • D. Only where the personal data is handled in a sufficiently structured manner so as to form part of a filing system.

Answer: D

Explanation:
The GDPR applies to all personal data, regardless of whether it exists in physical form or not. The GDPR defines personal data as any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person, such as names, identification numbers, location data, or online identifiers1. Therefore, any information that can be linked directly or indirectly to a natural person is considered personal data under the GDPR.
However, the GDPR also distinguishes between different types of processing activities and their legal bases. Processing activities are the operations performed on personal data, such as collection, storage, use, disclosure, or deletion. Processing activities can be either automated or manual. Automated processing means using technology to perform processing activities without human intervention. Manual processing means using human intervention to perform processing activities.
The GDPR requires that any processing activity that involves personal data must comply with certain principles and conditions, such as lawfulness, fairness, transparency, purpose limitation, data minimization, accuracy, storage limitation, integrity and confidentiality. These principles and conditions apply to both automated and manual processing activities.
Therefore, the GDPR applies to personal data that exists in physical form only when it is processed by an automated means in some way that affects its rights and freedoms. For example, if a company scans paper documents and stores them electronically in a database without deleting them after a certain period of time or when they are no longer needed for the original purpose for which they were collected (Article 6), then this would be considered an automated processing activity that involves personal data in physical form.
However, the GDPR does not apply to personal data that exists in physical form when it is handled in a sufficiently structured manner so as to form part of a filing system. For example, if a company keeps paper documents in folders labeled with names and dates on their office shelves without scanning them or storing them electronically anywhere else (Article 5), then this would not be considered an automated processing activity that involves personal data in physical form.
Reference:
Physical Data - GDPR Summary
What GDPR Means for Your Physical Records - Access
Personal Data - Data Protection Act 2018


NEW QUESTION # 137
A German data subject was the victim of an embarrassing prank 20 years ago. A newspaper website published an article about the prank at the time, and the article is still available on the newspaper's website.
Unfortunately, the prank is the top search result when a user searches on the victim's name. The data subject requests that SearchCo delist this result. SearchCo agrees, and instructs its technology team to avoid scanning or indexing the article. What else must SearchCo do?

  • A. Notify the newspaper that its article it is delisting the article.
  • B. Fully erase the URL to the content, as opposed to delist which is mainly based on data subject's name.
  • C. Identify other controllers who are processing the same information and inform them of the delisting request.
  • D. Prevent the article from being listed in search results no matter what search terms are entered into the search engine.

Answer: A

Explanation:
According to the European Data Protection Law & Practice textbook, page 326, "the CJEU held that the search engine operator is obliged to remove from the list of results displayed following a search made on the basis of a person's name links to web pages, published by third parties and containing information relating to that person, also in a case where that name or information is not erased beforehand or simultaneously from those web pages, and even, as the case may be, when its publication in itself on those pages is lawful." However, the CJEU also stated that "the operator of the search engine as the person responsible for that processing must, at the latest on the occasion of the erasure from its list of results, disclose to the operator of the web page containing that information the fact that that web page will no longer appear in the search engine's results following a search made on the basis of the data subject's name." Therefore, SearchCo must notify the newspaper that it is delisting the article, as part of its obligation to respect the data subject's right to be forgotten. References:
* European Data Protection Law & Practice, page 326
* CJEU Judgment in Case C-131/12 Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos, Mario Costeja Gonzalez, paragraphs 88 and 93


NEW QUESTION # 138
Which statement is correct when considering the right to privacy under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)?

  • A. The right to privacy has to be balanced against other rights under the ECHR
  • B. The right to freedom of expression under Article 10 of the ECHR will always override the right to privacy
  • C. The right to privacy protects the right to hold opinions and to receive and impart ideas without interference
  • D. The right to privacy is an absolute right

Answer: A


NEW QUESTION # 139
How does the GDPR now define "processing"?

  • A. Any use or disclosure of personal data compatible with the purpose for which the data was collected.
  • B. Any act involving the collecting and recording of personal data.
  • C. Any operation or set of operations performed by automated means on personal data or on sets of personal data.
  • D. Any operation or set of operations performed on personal data or on sets of personal data.

Answer: D


NEW QUESTION # 140
Many businesses print their employees' photographs on building passes, so that employees can be identified by security staff. This is notwithstanding the fact that facial images potentially qualify as biometric data under the GDPR. Why would such practice be permitted?

  • A. Because use of biometric data to confirm the unique identification of data subjects benefits from an exemption.
  • B. Because employees are deemed to have given their explicit consent when they agree to be photographed by their employer.
  • C. Because photographs qualify as biometric data only when they undergo a "specific technical processing".
  • D. Because photographic ID is a physical security measure which is "necessary for reasons of substantial public interest".

Answer: C

Explanation:
According to Recital 51 of the GDPR, photographs are not automatically considered as biometric data, unless they are processed by a specific technical means that allows the unique identification or authentication of a natural person1. This means that printing employees' photographs on building passes does not necessarily involve biometric data, as long as the photographs are not used for facial recognition or other similar purposes. The other options are incorrect, as they do not reflect the definition of biometric data or the conditions for processing special categories of personal data under the GDPR2. References:
* Recital 51 of the GDPR
* ICO guidance on special category data
Reference https://ess.csa.canon.com/rs/206-CLL-191/images/IAPP-Top-10-Operational-Impacts-of- GDPR.
pdf?TC=DM&CN=CSA_OMNIA_Partners&CS=CSA&CR=T1_Gov%20GenNonProfit (11)


NEW QUESTION # 141
Under the GDPR, who would be LEAST likely to be allowed to engage in the collection, use, and disclosure of a data subject's sensitive medical information without the data subject's knowledge or consent?

  • A. A health professional involved in the medical care for the data subject, where the data subject's life hinges on the timely dissemination of such information.
  • B. A member of the judiciary involved in adjudicating a legal dispute involving the data subject and concerning the health of the data subject.
  • C. A journalist writing an article relating to the medical condition in QUESTION, who believes that the publication of such information is in the public interest.
  • D. A public authority responsible for public health, where the sharing of such information is considered necessary for the protection of the general populace.

Answer: C

Explanation:
The GDPR defines data concerning health as a special category of personal data that is subject to specific processing conditions and safeguards. The GDPR prohibits the processing of such data unless one of the exceptions in Article 9 applies. One of these exceptions is the explicit consent of the data subject, which means that the data subject has given a clear and affirmative indication of their agreement to the processing of their health data. Another exception is when the processing is necessary for reasons of public interest in the area of public health, such as protecting against serious cross-border threats to health or ensuring high standards of quality and safety of health care. A third exception is when the processing is necessary for the purposes of preventive or occupational medicine, for the assessment of the working capacity of the employee, medical diagnosis, the provision of health or social care or treatment or the management of health or social care systems and services. These exceptions are based on the principle of necessity, which means that the processing must be strictly necessary for a specific purpose and cannot be achieved by other means.
In the given scenario, the journalist does not fall under any of these exceptions. The journalist is not a health professional, a public authority, or a person who has obtained the explicit consent of the data subject. The journalist is not processing the data for any legitimate purpose related to public health, medical care, or social protection. The journalist is merely pursuing their own interest in publishing a story that may or may not be in the public interest. The journalist is not respecting the data subject's rights and freedoms, especially their right to privacy and confidentiality. Therefore, the journalist would be least likely to be allowed to engage in the collection, use, and disclosure of the data subject's sensitive medical information without their knowledge or consent. References:
* Article 4 (15) and Article 9 of the GDPR
* Health data | ICO
* What does the GDPR mean for personal data in medical reports?
* Sensitive data and medical confidentiality - FutureLearn
* Health data and data privacy: storing sensitive data under GDPR


NEW QUESTION # 142
Under the GDPR, where personal data is not obtained directly from the data subject, a controller is exempt from directly providing information about processing to the data subject if?

  • A. The processing of the data subject's data is protected by appropriate technical measures
  • B. The provision of such information to the data subject would be too problematic
  • C. The data subject already has information regarding how his data will be used
  • D. Third-party data would be disclosed by providing such information to the data subject

Answer: C

Explanation:
According to Article 14 of the GDPR, where personal data is not obtained directly from the data subject, the controller must provide the data subject with certain information about the processing, such as the identity of the controller, the purposes and legal basis of the processing, the categories of personal data concerned, the recipients or categories of recipients of the personal data, and the rights of the data subject12. However, there are some exceptions to this obligation, as specified in Article 14(5). One of them is when the provision of such information proves impossible or would involve a disproportionate effort, in particular for processing for archiving purposes in the public interest, scientific or historical research purposes or statistical purposes, subject to the conditions and safeguards referred to in Article 89(1) or in so far as the obligation is likely to render impossible or seriously impair the achievement of the objectives of that processing12. In such cases, the controller must take appropriate measures to protect the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, including making the information publicly available12. References: CIPP/E Certification - International Association of Privacy Professionals, Free CIPP/E Study Guide - International Association of Privacy Professionals, GDPR - EUR-Lex, Right to be Informed - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)


NEW QUESTION # 143
Data retention in the EU was underpinned by a legal framework established by the Data Retention Directive (2006/24/EC). Why is the Directive no longer part of EU law?

  • A. The Directive was superseded by the EU Directive on Privacy and Electronic Communications.
  • B. The Directive was annulled by the European Court of Human Rights.
  • C. The Directive was superseded by the General Data Protection Regulation.
  • D. The Directive was annulled by the Court of Justice of the European Union.

Answer: D

Explanation:
The Data Retention Directive (2006/24/EC) was a legal framework that required Member States to ensure that providers of publicly available electronic communications services or of public communications networks retained certain data for a period of between six months and two years, for the purpose of the prevention, investigation, detection and prosecution of serious crime1. However, on 8 April 2014, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) declared the Directive invalid, as it entailed a wide-ranging and particularly serious interference with the fundamental rights to respect for private life and to the protection of personal data, without limiting the access of the competent national authorities to the data retained to what was strictly necessary2. The CJEU also found that the Directive did not provide sufficient safeguards to ensure effective protection of the data against the risk of abuse and against any unlawful access and use of the data2.
Therefore, the Directive is no longer part of EU law.
References:
* Directive 2006/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
* Court of Justice of the European Union PRESS RELEASE No 54/14
I hope this helps you understand the GDPR and data retention better. If you have any other questions, please feel free to ask me. #


NEW QUESTION # 144
A U.S. company's website sells widgets. Which of the following factors would NOT in itself subject the company to the GDPR?

  • A. The website places cookies to monitor the EU website user behavior.
  • B. The widgets are offered in EU and priced in euro.
  • C. The website is in English and French, and is accessible in France.
  • D. An affiliate office is located in France but the processing is in the U.S.

Answer: C

Explanation:
ccording to the GDPR, the regulation applies to the processing of personal data in the context of the activities of an establishment of a controller or a processor in the Union, regardless of whether the processing takes place in the Union or not1. The GDPR also applies to the processing of personal data of data subjects who are in the Union by a controller or processor not established in the Union, where the processing activities are related to: (a) the offering of goods or services, irrespective of whether a payment of the data subject is required, to such data subjects in the Union; or (b) the monitoring of their behaviour as far as their behaviour takes place within the Union1.
In this scenario, a U.S. company's website sells widgets to customers in the EU and places cookies to monitor their behavior. These factors would subject the company to the GDPR, as they indicate that the company is offering goods or services and monitoring the behavior of data subjects in the Union2. However, the fact that the website is in English and French, and is accessible in France, would not in itself subject the company to the GDPR, as these factors do not necessarily imply an intention to target customers in the Union3. The language and accessibility of the website are not sufficient to establish a relevant and sufficient degree of stability and continuity of the company's activities in the Union3. Therefore, the correct answer is B.
References:
* Art. 3 GDPR - Territorial scope
* Guidelines 3/2018 on the territorial scope of the GDPR (Article 3)
* What does territorial scope mean under the GDPR?
I hope this helps you understand the GDPR and territorial scope better. If you have any other questions, please feel free to ask me. #


NEW QUESTION # 145
Under the GDPR, where personal data is not obtained directly from the data subject, a controller is exempt from directly providing information about processing to the data subject if?

  • A. The processing of the data subject's data is protected by appropriate technical measures
  • B. The provision of such information to the data subject would be too problematic
  • C. The data subject already has information regarding how his data will be used
  • D. Third-party data would be disclosed by providing such information to the data subject

Answer: C

Explanation:
Reference https://dataprivacymanager.net/gdpr-exemptions-from-the-obligation-to-provide-information-to-the- individual-data-subject/


NEW QUESTION # 146
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next question:
You have just been hired by a toy manufacturer based in Hong Kong. The company sells a broad range of dolls, action figures and plush toys that can be found internationally in a wide variety of retail stores.
Although the manufacturer has no offices outside Hong Kong and in fact does not employ any staff outside Hong Kong, it has entered into a number of local distribution contracts. The toys produced by the company can be found in all popular toy stores throughout Europe, the United States and Asia. A large portion of the company's revenue is due to international sales.
The company now wishes to launch a new range of connected toys, ones that can talk and interact with children. The CEO of the company is touting these toys as the next big thing, due to the increased possibilities offered: The figures can answer children's Questions: on various subjects, such as mathematical calculations or the weather. Each figure is equipped with a microphone and speaker and can connect to any smartphone or tablet via Bluetooth. Any mobile device within a 10-meter radius can connect to the toys via Bluetooth as well. The figures can also be associated with other figures (from the same manufacturer) and interact with each other for an enhanced play experience.
When a child asks the toy a QUESTION, the request is sent to the cloud for analysis, and the answer is generated on cloud servers and sent back to the figure. The answer is given through the figure's integrated speakers, making it appear as though that the toy is actually responding to the child's QUESTION. The packaging of the toy does not provide technical details on how this works, nor does it mention that this feature requires an internet connection. The necessary data processing for this has been outsourced to a data center located in South Africa. However, your company has not yet revised its consumer-facing privacy policy to indicate this.
In parallel, the company is planning to introduce a new range of game systems through which consumers can play the characters they acquire in the course of playing the game. The system will come bundled with a portal that includes a Near-Field Communications (NFC) reader. This device will read an RFID tag in the action figure, making the figure come to life onscreen. Each character has its own stock features and abilities, but it is also possible to earn additional ones by accomplishing game goals. The only information stored in the tag relates to the figures' abilities. It is easy to switch characters during the game, and it is possible to bring the figure to locations outside of the home and have the character's abilities remain intact.
In light of the requirements of Article 32 of the GDPR (related to the Security of Processing), which practice should the company institute?

  • A. Insert contractual clauses into the contract between the toy manufacturer and the cloud service provider, since South Africa is outside the European Union.
  • B. Encrypt the data in transit over the wireless Bluetooth connection.
  • C. Include dual-factor authentication before each use by a child in order to ensure a minimum amount of security.
  • D. Include three-factor authentication before each use by a child in order to ensure the best level of security possible.

Answer: B

Explanation:
According to Article 32 of the GDPR, the controller and the processor must implement appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk of processing personal data, taking into account the state of the art, the costs of implementation, and the nature, scope, context and purposes of processing, as well as the risk of varying likelihood and severity for the rights and freedoms of natural persons. The GDPR also provides some examples of such measures, including the pseudonymisation and encryption of personal data, the ability to ensure the ongoing confidentiality, integrity, availability and resilience of processing systems and services, the ability to restore the availability and access to personal data in a timely manner in the event of a physical or technical incident, and a process for regularly testing, assessing and evaluating the effectiveness of technical and organisational measures for ensuring the security of the processing.
In this scenario, the company is processing personal data of children, such as their voice, questions, preferences, and location, through the connected toys that use a wireless Bluetooth connection to communicate with smartphones, tablets, cloud servers, and other toys. This poses a high risk to the security of the data, as Bluetooth is a short-range wireless technology that can be easily intercepted, hacked, or compromised by malicious actors. Therefore, the company should encrypt the data in transit over the Bluetooth connection, to prevent unauthorized access, disclosure, or alteration of the data. Encryption is a process of transforming data into an unreadable form, using a secret key or algorithm, that can only be reversed by authorized parties who have the corresponding key or algorithm. Encryption can protect the data from being accessed or modified by anyone who does not have the key or algorithm, thus ensuring the confidentiality and integrity of the data.
The other options are incorrect because:
* B. Including dual-factor authentication before each use by a child in order to ensure a minimum amount of security is not a sufficient measure to protect the data in transit over the Bluetooth connection. Dual- factor authentication is a process of verifying the identity of a user by requiring two pieces of evidence, such as a password and a code sent to a phone or email. While this may enhance the security of the user' s account or device, it does not protect the data that is transmitted over the wireless connection, which can still be intercepted, hacked, or compromised by malicious actors. Moreover, dual-factor authentication may not be suitable or convenient for children, who may not have access to a phone or email, or who may forget their passwords or codes.
* C. Including three-factor authentication before each use by a child in order to ensure the best level of security possible is not a necessary or proportionate measure to protect the data in transit over the Bluetooth connection. Three-factor authentication is a process of verifying the identity of a user by requiring three pieces of evidence, such as a password, a code sent to a phone or email, and a biometric feature, such as a fingerprint or a face scan. While this may provide a high level of security for the user' s account or device, it does not protect the data that is transmitted over the wireless connection, which can still be intercepted, hacked, or compromised by malicious actors. Furthermore, three-factor authentication may not be appropriate or feasible for children, who may not have access to a phone or email, or who may not have reliable biometric features, or who may find the process too complex or cumbersome.
* D. Inserting contractual clauses into the contract between the toy manufacturer and the cloud service provider, since South Africa is outside the European Union, is not a relevant measure to protect the data in transit over the Bluetooth connection. Contractual clauses are legal agreements that specify the obligations and responsibilities of the parties involved in a data transfer, such as the level of data protection, the rights of data subjects, and the remedies for breaches. While contractual clauses may be necessary to ensure the compliance of the data transfer to South Africa, which is a non-EU country that does not have an adequacy decision from the European Commission, they do not address the security of the data that is transmitted over the wireless connection, which can still be intercepted, hacked, or compromised by malicious actors. Moreover, contractual clauses are not a technical or organisational measure, but a legal measure, that falls under a different provision of the GDPR, namely Article 46.
References: Article 32 and Recitals (75), (76), (78), (83), and (85) of the GDPR, Security of processing, Encryption, Authentication, [Contractual clauses]


NEW QUESTION # 147
Which aspect of the GDPR will likely have the most impact on the consistent implementation of data protection laws throughout the European Union?

  • A. That it makes appointment of a data protection officer mandatory
  • B. That it essentially functions as a one-stop shop mechanism
  • C. That it makes notification of large-scale data breaches mandatory
  • D. That it takes the form of a Regulation as opposed to a Directive

Answer: D

Explanation:
One of the main differences between a Regulation and a Directive in the EU law is that a Regulation is directly applicable and binding in all EU member states, without the need for national implementing measures, while a Directive sets out the objectives and principles that the member states must achieve, but leaves them the choice of form and methods to transpose it into their national laws. Therefore, by taking the form of a Regulation, the GDPR aims to harmonize and unify the data protection rules across the EU, and to ensure a consistent implementation and enforcement of the data protection laws throughout the EU. The other aspects of the GDPR listed in the question, such as the one-stop shop mechanism, the mandatory notification of large-scale data breaches, and the mandatory appointment of a data protection officer, are also important features of the GDPR, but they do not have the same impact on the consistency of the data protection laws as the form of a Regulation.


NEW QUESTION # 148
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Javier is a member of the fitness club EVERFIT. This company has branches in many EU member states, but for the purposes of the GDPR maintains its primary establishment in France. Javier lives in Newry, Northern Ireland (part of the U.K.), and commutes across the border to work in Dundalk, Ireland. Two years ago while on a business trip, Javier was photographed while working out at a branch of EVERFIT in Frankfurt, Germany. At the time, Javier gave his consent to being included in the photograph, since he was told that it would be used for promotional purposes only. Since then, the photograph has been used in the club's U.K. brochures, and it features in the landing page of its U.K. website. However, the fitness club has recently fallen into disrepute due to widespread mistreatment of members at various branches of the club in several EU member states. As a result, Javier no longer feels comfortable with his photograph being publicly associated with the fitness club.
After numerous failed attempts to book an appointment with the manager of the local branch to discuss this matter, Javier sends a letter to EVETFIT requesting that his image be removed from the website and all promotional materials. Months pass and Javier, having received no acknowledgment of his request, becomes very anxious about this matter. After repeatedly failing to contact EVETFIT through alternate channels, he decides to take action against the company.
Javier contacts the U.K. Information Commissioner's Office ('ICO' - the U.K.'s supervisory authority) to lodge a complaint about this matter. The ICO, pursuant to Article 56 (3) of the GDPR, informs the CNIL (i.e. the supervisory authority of EVERFIT's main establishment) about this matter. Despite the fact that EVERFIT has an establishment in the U.K., the CNIL decides to handle the case in accordance with Article 60 of the GDPR. The CNIL liaises with the ICO, as relevant under the cooperation procedure. In light of issues amongst the supervisory authorities to reach a decision, the European Data Protection Board becomes involved and, pursuant to the consistency mechanism, issues a binding decision.
Additionally, Javier sues EVERFIT for the damages caused as a result of its failure to honor his request to have his photograph removed from the brochure and website.
Assuming that multiple EVETFIT branches across several EU countries are acting as separate data controllers, and that each of those branches were responsible for mishandling Javier's request, how may Javier proceed in order to seek compensation?

  • A. He will be able to apply to the European Data Protection Board in order to determine which particular EVETFIT branch is liable for damages, based on the decision that was made by the board.
  • B. He will have to sue each EVETFIT branch so that each branch provides proportionate compensation commensurate with its contribution to the damage or distress suffered by Javier.
  • C. He will have to sue the EVETFIT's head office in France, where EVETFIT has its main establishment.
  • D. He will be able to sue any one of the relevant EVETFIT branches, as each one may be held liable for the entire damage.

Answer: C


NEW QUESTION # 149
Which GDPR principle would a Spanish employer most likely depend upon to annually send the personal data of its employees to the national tax authority?

  • A. The legitimate interest of the public administration.
  • B. The legal obligation of the employer.
  • C. The protection of the vital interest of the employees.
  • D. The consent of the employees.

Answer: B


NEW QUESTION # 150
In which scenario is a Controller most likely required to undertake a Data Protection Impact Assessment?

  • A. When personal data is being transferred outside of the EEA.
  • B. When the controller is required to have a Data Protection Officer.
  • C. When the controller is collecting email addresses from individuals via an online registration form for marketing purposes.
  • D. When personal data is being collected and combined with other personal data to profile the creditworthiness of individuals.

Answer: B

Explanation:
Reference:
%20the%20General,and%20freedoms%20of%20natural%20persons%27.


NEW QUESTION # 151
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next question:
The fitness company Vigotron has recently developed a new app called M-Health, which it wants to market on its website as a free download. Vigotron's marketing manager asks his assistant Emily to create a webpage that describes the app and specifies the terms of use. Emily, who is new at Vigotron, is excited about this task. At her previous job she took a data protection class, and though the details are a little hazy, she recognizes that Vigotron is going to need to obtain user consent for use of the app in some cases. Emily sketches out the following draft, trying to cover as much as possible before sending it to Vigotron's legal department.
Registration Form
Vigotron's new M-Health app makes it easy for you to monitor a variety of health-related activities, including diet, exercise, and sleep patterns. M-Health relies on your smartphone settings (along with other third-party apps you may already have) to collect data about all of these important lifestyle elements, and provide the information necessary for you to enrich your quality of life. (Please click here to read a full description of the services that M-Health provides.) Vigotron values your privacy. The M-Heaith app allows you to decide which information is stored in it, and which apps can access your dat a. When your device is locked with a passcode, all of your health and fitness data is encrypted with your passcode. You can back up data stored in the Health app to Vigotron's cloud provider, Stratculous. (Read more about Stratculous here.) Vigotron will never trade, rent or sell personal information gathered from the M-Health app. Furthermore, we will not provide a customer's name, email address or any other information gathered from the app to any third- party without a customer's consent, unless ordered by a court, directed by a subpoena, or to enforce the manufacturer's legal rights or protect its business or property.
We are happy to offer the M-Health app free of charge. If you want to download and use it, we ask that you first complete this registration form. (Please note that use of the M-Health app is restricted to adults aged 16 or older, unless parental consent has been given to minors intending to use it.) First name:
Surname:
Year of birth:
Email:
Physical Address (optional*):
Health status:
*If you are interested in receiving newsletters about our products and services that we think may be of interest to you, please include your physical address. If you decide later that you do not wish to receive these newsletters, you can unsubscribe by sending an email to [email protected] or send a letter with your request to the address listed at the bottom of this page.
Terms and Conditions
1. Jurisdiction. [...]
2. Applicable law. [...]
3. Limitation of liability. [...]
Consent
By completing this registration form, you attest that you are at least 16 years of age, and that you consent to the processing of your personal data by Vigotron for the purpose of using the M-Health app. Although you are entitled to opt out of any advertising or marketing, you agree that Vigotron may contact you or provide you with any required notices, agreements, or other information concerning the services by email or other electronic means. You also agree that the Company may send automated emails with alerts regarding any problems with the M-Health app that may affect your well being.
Emily sends the draft to Sam for review. Which of the following is Sam most likely to point out as the biggest problem with Emily's consent provision?

  • A. It is not legal to include fields requiring information regarding health status without consent.
  • B. Direct marketing requires explicit consent, whereas the registration form only provides for a right to object
  • C. The provision of the fitness app should be made conditional on the consent to the data processing for direct marketing.
  • D. Processing health data requires explicit consent, but the form does not ask for explicit consent.

Answer: B

Explanation:
According to the GDPR, personal data must be collected for specified, explicit and legitimate purposes and not further processed in a manner that is incompatible with those purposes1. This means that data controllers must inform data subjects about the purposes of data processing and obtain their consent or another lawful basis for any new or different purposes2.
In the scenario, Brady transferred his customers' personal data to Hermes Designs, a third-party contractor, to fulfill a requested service. However, Hermes Designs used the data for a new purpose that was not disclosed to the customers: creating sample customized banner advertisements and conducting direct marketing. This is a violation of the purpose limitation principle and could expose Brady to legal risks and customer complaints.
Therefore, Brady should be concerned with Hermes Designs' handling of customer personal data and take appropriate measures to ensure compliance with the GDPR.
I hope this helps. If you have any other questions, please feel free to ask.
1: Article 5(1)(b) of the GDPR 2: Article 6(4) of the GDPR


NEW QUESTION # 152
A dynamic Internet Protocol (IP) address is considered persona! data when it is combined with what?

  • A. Other data held by the controller
  • B. Other data held by recipients of the data.
  • C. Other data held by the processor.
  • D. Other data held by Internet Service Providers (ISPs).

Answer: A

Explanation:
A dynamic IP address is a unique numerical label for a device on the internet that changes every time the device connects to the internet. A dynamic IP address by itself is not personal data, as it does not directly identify the person who owns or uses the device. However, a dynamic IP address can become personal data when it is combined with other data held by the controller, such as the web pages accessed by the device, the time and duration of the visit, the location of the device, or the user's preferences and interests. In this case, the controller can use the additional data to identify the data subject, either directly or indirectly, by linking the dynamic IP address to a specific person or a profile. This was confirmed by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the case of Breyer v Bundesrepublik Deutschland, where the CJEU ruled that a dynamic IP address registered by a website provider constitutes personal data in relation to that provider, where the latter has the legal means to obtain the identity of the data subject from the internet service provider (ISP) that assigned the dynamic IP address. Therefore, option B is the correct answer. References: Directive 95
/46/EC, Directive 2002/58/EC, Breyer v Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Case C-582/14, Dynamic IP Addresses can be Personal Data


NEW QUESTION # 153
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Jack worked as a Pharmacovigiliance Operations Specialist in the Irish office of a multinational pharmaceutical company on a clinical trial related to COVID-19. As part of his onboarding process Jack received privacy training He was explicitly informed that while he would need to process confidential patient data in the course of his work, he may under no circumstances use this data for anything other than the performance of work-related (asks This was also specified in the privacy policy, which Jack signed upon conclusion of the training.
After several months of employment, Jack got into an argument with a patient over the phone. Out of anger he later posted the patient's name and hearth information, along with disparaging comments, on a social media website. When this was discovered by his Pharmacovigilance supervisors. Jack was immediately dismissed Jack's lawyer sent a letter to the company stating that dismissal was a disproportionate sanction, and that if Jack was not reinstated within 14 days his firm would have no alternative but to commence legal proceedings against the company. This letter was accompanied by a data access request from Jack requesting a copy of "all personal data, including internal emails that were sent/received by Jack or where Jack is directly or indirectly identifiable from the contents In relation to the emails Jack listed six members of the management team whose inboxes he required access.
The company conducted an initial search of its IT systems, which returned a large amount of information They then contacted Jack, requesting that he be more specific regarding what information he required, so that they could carry out a targeted search Jack responded by stating that he would not narrow the scope of the information requester.
Under Article 82 of the GDPR ("Right to compensation and liability-), which party is liable for the damage caused by the data breach?

  • A. Both parties are exempt, as the company is involved in human health research
  • B. Jack is liable
  • C. The pharmaceutical company is liable.
  • D. Jack and the pharmaceutical company are jointly liable.

Answer: B

Explanation:
Article 82 of the GDPR introduces a right to compensation for damage caused as a result of an infringement of the GDPR1. Article 82 (1) states that any person who has suffered material or non-material damage as a result of an infringement of the GDPR shall have the right to receive compensation from the controller or processor for the damage suffered1. Article 82 (2) states that any controller involved in processing shall be liable for the damage caused by processing which infringes the GDPR1. A processor shall be liable for the damage caused by processing only where it has not complied with obligations of the GDPR specifically directed to processors or where it has acted outside or contrary to lawful instructions of the controller1. Article 82 (3) states that a controller or processor shall be exempt from liability under paragraph 2 if it proves that it is not in any way responsible for the event giving rise to the damage1. In this case, Jack is liable for the damage caused by the data breach, as he violated the GDPR by posting the patient's name and health information, along with disparaging comments, on a social media website. This constitutes an infringement of the GDPR, as it violates the principles of lawfulness, fairness, and transparency (Article 5 (1) (a)), purpose limitation (Article 5 (1) (b)), data minimisation (Article 5 (1) ), accuracy (Article 5 (1) (d)), integrity and confidentiality (Article 5 (1) (f)), and the rights of the data subject (Articles 12-23)1. The pharmaceutical company is not liable for the damage caused by the data breach, as it can prove that it is not in any way responsible for the event giving rise to the damage. The company provided privacy training to Jack, informed him of the privacy policy, obtained his consent, and dismissed him as soon as the breach was discovered. Therefore, the company complied with the obligations of the GDPR, such as the accountability principle (Article 5 (2)), the data protection by design and by default principle (Article 25), the security of processing principle (Article 32), and the notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority principle (Article 33)1. Therefore, option D is the correct answer. References: Art. 82 GDPR - Right to compensation and liability, Article 82 GDPR - GDPRhub


NEW QUESTION # 154
......

Latest CIPP-E Exam Dumps IAPP Exam: https://www.testpdf.com/CIPP-E-exam-braindumps.html

Pass IAPP CIPP-E PDF Dumps Recently Updated 298 Questions: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1dc5HAoYAJvLqz0jxMHXbCVrQy2QhwJpm